Відео

Cyanide, arsenic and plutonium are also natural. Are you going to consume plenty of those too? The body of evidence supporting a causal role of LDL and atherosclerosis consists of over 200 prospective cohort studies, over 2 million participants, 20 million person years of follow up, over 150,000 cardiovascular disease events. We've got genetic studies based on genetic predisposition to either higher or lower LDL cholesterol, and we've got all kinds of mechanistic and experimental evidence. From the cardiovascular side, the lipid hypothesis is as scientifically coherent and persuasive a body of evidence in favor of a causal role for LDL as you can get. This consensus statement cites 343 studies proving the above: academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz962/5735221 Or you can keep going with your unscientific inference, but those emojis are laughing at YOU, if so.

Thanks, mate!

Do you need someone to tell you that it’s wrong to victimise others?

@@HenchHerbivore philosophically speaking, yes. cruelty is a human concept, without humans here to call this cruel and that humane we’d have a bunch of animals biting each others heads off.

You don’t consider confinement, exploitation; mutilation and killing to be abusive? Are you sure? If so simply prove it by switching places with your victims: 😉

I find it hard to believe that you don’t consider confinement, exploitation, mutilation and killing to be abusive. Feel free to prove my wrong by switching places though! 😃

@@HenchHerbivore Nice catch phrases. Completely wrong. There is no exploitation, mutilation, and abuse. You obviously didn't grow up in a farming community like I did. I have been on many farms my whole life and none of them abused their livestock and when it came time to harvest them, they were euthanized quickly and with no pain. Your use of these terms are out of context and is ridiculous. At least vegans in the 60s and 70s minded their own business and didn't try to demonize those that weren't. Typical woke nonsense in this culture these days.

@@HenchHerbivore Ridiculous to call animals victims. Is a gazelle a victim when a lion eats it to survive? Inuits, and those living near and above the Arctic circle, eat nothing but meat. They harpoon whales, walrus, seals and eat caribou as well as fish. Do you think they should starve to death just in consideration of the animals feelings? Animals are animals and human beings are human beings. Human beings are omnivores just like all the other omnivore species on the planet. By the way, Inuits are on a carnivore diet and they are healthier than most western civilizations. My parents generation 8 meet every day and their living into their 80s and 90s. Your claim that being strictly vegan is healthier is false. It doesn't hold up to historical fact.

You mean crop deaths? Wild animals haven't been proven to die at a higher rate in crop fields than in the wild but even if they did veganism would still cause less death. More crops are needed to feed tens of billions of farm animals than 8 billion humans.

You speak like a native German. Well done! Most people’s pronunciation is 🐕💩. Then in their stupidity, they have the audacity to criticise ME! I mean, can you imagine?! 😃 Have a great day, fellow excellent German word pronouncer! 🇩🇪

Sentence of a triggered pro-animal abuser

Great question! Nutritionally speaking, milk is basically liquid meat. It’s has the same harmful saturated fat and cholesterol. Additionally, it has harmful free sugars (sugars not bound to fibre) in the form of lactose. Free sugars raise the risk for multiple diseases including Alzheimer’s, which is now the UK’s leading cause of death. The only reasons that dairy milk can be used to make kefir is that the cow ate plants. The same resistant starch can be sourced from plant milks, with none of the negatives.

Update: I made a pudding by adding berries and pear puré to it. It is quite fantastic! I recommend to try it in some form! 🙂

If used as gelatin replacement (deppressing to think about so called gelatin) it could have a "punch line" that says: ...and it is complete protein

From my understanding it’s a tiny amount per million calories, unless you’ve newer, better data to prove otherwise? Either way, it’s gotta be a minuscule fraction compared to those eaten by the 80,000,000,000 farmed animals that are stabbed in the neck each year to just end up on the plates of carnists. Not to mention that 2,700,000,000,000 sea creatures per year that are ripped out of the sea to painfully suffocate to death on your behalf’s. It’s impossible to cause ZERO harm. No-one’s denying that. But at least we’re fucking trying! Rather than try find to find fault in others, how about you don’t MAXIMISE the amount of suffering that you cause? Thanks for commenting.

I think the irony in your argument is that more non-vegans eat more avocadoes and soy than vegans, because there are simply so many more non-vegans, so a marginal increase in plant-based calorie consumption for a person after switching to veganism has a tiny increase in plant consumption when compared to the animals that are forcefully bred (r4ped), stolen from their parents, fed soy (over 70% fed to livestock) or grass grown in unoccupied (by animals) fields (which could be used to grow a large variety of plants), raised for usually for up to 5 years (being generous) and then brutally murdered for human consumption. Those animals live off plants, we would actually be ok with growing less food overall if we stopped farming animals. While you raise good points in your argument, we don't live in a world where your points are logical or possible, you're not arguing against veganism, you're arguing against facts and logic. But nice try, here's a gold star 🌟

LLandS18 is right tho. Obviously, when an intelligent animal, who is fully aware of their surroundings, notices that a big and fucking loud machine is moving towards them, they will just stay there to die. They clearly have no survival instincts at all. Oh wait... For those who might not have gotten the sarcasm: it was sarcasm. Animals flee when they are about to be overrun. Crazy concept. By the way, even if we assume that growing plants is just as unethical and violent as raising livestock because of crop deaths (which is ridiculous, but let's pretend, for the sake of the argument): plant agriculture has the potential to not be violent (vertical, indoor, veganic, bio-and ecological farming, and God knows what else. In a vegan world, more attention would be paid to not harm animals in the process; that's not the case in the fucked up carnist world that we live in). On the other hand, animal agriculture is by definition cruel. PS I've just recently discovered your channel, Hench; through a comment under a Coach Carnivore Cam video ( I enjoy watching cringe content for some reason). Instant subscribe!

@@HummusAddict-sq3ld yeah I mean nobody ever gets hit by a car. I mean ever since the invention of cars in America zero people have ever been hit by one. You're so right. Tell me sweetheart, how many Fields have you plowed. How many fruits and vegetables do you grow. Probably none or you have a sweet little backyard garden. You think that makes you an expert in farming. But that's right. You keep thinking you have the moral high ground. Never take into account that some people can't afford to be vegan or some people live in a region where vegan food is not available. Or some people have medical conditions where they can't be being. But just remember you're better than all those people. It must be amazing to be so detached from how food Is grown and brought to your table.

@LLandS18 Your retort is pointless, because most of the animals flee, how easy it is to hit a fly? You have to slow down, and plan your next moves just nearly miss it, unlike harvesting equipment, where most humans are able to get out of the way of the car so the numbers of those who get hit by cars and those who manage to get out of the way are also stablished against of your argument. If there are 100 people just chilling in the road while a steam roller is coming at them at 15mph do you think they're just going to sit there and let themselves get crushed? TL;DR, your point is moot because the numbers are against you, even in your hypothetical pedestrian-car collision.

“You’re”. Plant expert?!? I don’t work at a garden centre, numbnuts. I’m a Nutritionist. That’s likely a big word for you so you might like to look that up, or you could ask mummy. LOL

Thank you 🙏

Hi! Nutritionist here. What you’re saying is not the scientific consensus. We can live extremely healthily and happily without funding animal cruelty. I have a free e-guide which explains succinctly how it’s done. All scientifically verified: henchherbivore.com Just for the record, the man that invented the whole carnivore, omnivore, herbivore system of taxonomy that you’re using, Carl Linnaeus, labelled humans as frugivores (a subset of herbivore).

Please. You forgot to say please. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33599941/ Thanks for watching and have a great day.

Go back to school.

Dumdum do not seem to spell gud.